Ooh, that’s just wrong.

September 17th, 2008 § 0 comments § permalink

[[image:kids_juices.jpg::center:0]]

Via Obnoxio the Clown

Labour Party conference

September 17th, 2008 § 0 comments § permalink

Beer, drugs and shouting at the party in power. What more could you want of a weekend?

[[image:06-08-2008_21-13-06.jpg::center:0]]

The Governments opinion

September 16th, 2008 § 0 comments § permalink

The Guardian:

Phorm, the controversial ad-targeting system, does conform to European data laws, the UK government has said

Bollox.

Plymouth to Banjul Challenge

September 15th, 2008 § 0 comments § permalink

The Plymouth-Banjul Challenge:

The original Banger Challenge, that has spawned so many others. In December 2002, the first group of hopeful souls left the UK in a motley collection of vehicles, optimistically believing that Julian Nowill knew what he was doing, and had substance and experience behind his words. Despite later finding out to the contrary, this first event was a great success and most of the 42 Teams even made it to Banjul. This Challenge is now in it’s seventh year!

The Banjul Challenge heads South through Morocco, Western Sahara, Mauritania and Senegal, arriving in Banjul in The Gambia. The route travels mostly on tarmac roads, but the highlight is the two-day crossing of the Sahara Desert. The journey is approximately 3700 miles, and can comfortably be covered in three weeks (if all goes well). Those in a hurry have completed in under two weeks, but that is missing the point, really. This is NOT a race. There is so much of interest en-route that it makes no sense to rush your travels.

The Challenge really starts in Southern Spain, where hotel accommodation is provided. The Road Book provides the clues as the Participants bond over a beer (or two) in the hotel bar, and form into travelling groups for the journey South. Ahead lies Sand, Sea and… even more sand. Experience the heat of the desert sun, and the challenge of nursing a knackered car all the way to destinations that most people would only consider flying to.

This Challenge is only open to Left-Hand Drive vehicles. The route can be completed by almost any vehicle, and there is no distinct advantage to having 4×4 drive (except when others are stuck in the sand!). It is a condition of entry that All vehicles MUST be donated to the Control Committee in The Gambia. The vehicles are auctioned and the funds raised are distributed to local worthy causes. This is the only legitimate way to ensure that the best price is obtained and that the funds are distributed appropriately. Nasty things do happen to those who might flout this requirement, because it is illegal to sell your vehicle privately.

And I have a couple of friends doing it this year.

Team Gonzo.

The vehicle Team Gonzo have bought is a 23 year old BMW E30. Not just any BMW, but a 324 diesel, which according to my sources wasn’t available in 1985.
Oh, did I mention that it cost £100? There’s been a couple of teething problems with it, but the guys are working their way through them and getting the car sorted ready for departure at the end of December.

Rajan and Ravi are doing this, not just for an adventure, but to raise some money for a couple of charities, in addition to the local organisations that receive the proceed from the auction of the vehicles in Banjul.
The first is Kids For Kids:

KIDS FOR KIDS helps children living in remote villages in Darfur, Sudan, who live lives of inexcusable hardship. It is the only organisation created specially to help children in Darfur. It supports families through long term, self sustainable projects, identified and run by the villagers themselves. KIDS FOR KIDS is different because it enables people to improve their own lives in the way they want – by listening to the families themselves we help them in the most effective way. And by supporting a number of initiatives, some very small, we are making a major difference to over 165,000 people – despite the tragedy of the ongoing conflict.

and the second is Build A School In India:

Who are we?
Id:ology.
All our work is dedicated to helping people to be the best version of themselves they can be. What it means to be yourself, to be fully alive, and to put that originality of identity to work, at work.
Click here to find out more.

Every year we nominate a cause in residence.
This year, our cause is St. Mary’s School in India. It’s the biggest project that we’ve tackled so far, and for that we need your help.
St. Mary’s School needs only $300,000 (currently just over £150,000) to give each child the opportunity of two years of further education, enabling them to get to university, and we’ve pledged to help them raise it. Our aim is to extend the school, in building, in capacity, in capability, and reach.

Throw $300,000 at the education system of a developed country and it will barely make a difference. Put it in the little oasis of possibility that’s St. Mary’s School, and you’ll be making infinite use of a finite sum. If we can awaken the children, we can save the world.

So be a sport and sponsor, donate or whatever you want to call it and help Rajan and Ravi raise some money for kids that desperately need it. Just a fiver or tenner will do. They are taking your sponsorship/donations via JustGiving.com here (for Kids for Kids) and here (Build a school in India).

On Zimbabwe powersharing

September 15th, 2008 § 0 comments § permalink

BBC:

Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe has signed a historic power-sharing deal with his long-time rival, opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai.

The two smiled and shook hands at the ceremony in the capital, Harare, attended by African dignitaries.

Mr Tsvangirai said the agreement provided the best hope for Zimbabwe and called on President Mugabe to work together to implement the deal.

Mr Mugabe said he was committed to national unity and would do “his best”.

Mugabe will do “his best”? What the fuck does that mean? He’s gonna try not to have people beaten shitless? He isn’t going to make people disappear?

Part of me thinks the MDC are kidding themselves and shouldn’t go into an agreement with that cunt. Would you trust him? They should’ve ousted him.

The other part of me, thinks it’s easy for me to say the above when there aren’t any so called ‘war veterans’ on their way round to my house wanting to show me their collection hammers, drills and bits of wood with nails through the end.

Slow, gradual change generally leads to a more stable result in the end anyway, doesn’t it? And again, I can accept a slow transformation, I don’t have to pay millions for a loaf of bread.

Vote for change

September 15th, 2008 § 0 comments § permalink

The petition:

We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to promote a meaningful public debate on voters’ experience of elections, and let voters determine if there is a case for changing the way we elect MPs.

The response:

…the Government continues to believe that the current voting system for UK general elections works well, and that any future change would require the consent of the British people in a referendum.

The system can’t be changed without a referendum, fair enough, but if we can’t have a referendum for the EU constitutionthere certainly won’t be one for this.

The price of libel

September 15th, 2008 § 0 comments § permalink

Ben Goldacre on The Guardian fighting a libel case brought by ‘vitamin pill’ magnate Matthias Rath:

I should also mention that I am extremely pleased and – cheesily – proud that the Guardian fought this case. It’s exactly the kind of thing I’d have expected from them, it’s the paper my grandparents bought, blah blah blah, and to me today everything they stand for is still very good indeed.

Newspapers can be very good things, and today the Guardian is a very good one indeed.

Bravo and well done to the Guardian and Ben, but if you read the piece, they have been awarded interim costs of about £250k, with the total cost of it all coming to about £0.5 million, which they are seeking.

if that had been a private individual, that money would need to found from somewhere, and in all likely hood, not found and so silenced.
Freedom of speech has a price. And that price is whatever the lawyers say it is.

Trying to tell the truth

September 12th, 2008 § 0 comments § permalink

Craig Murray:

I am trying to write a memoir giving a first hand account of what I did and what I personally witnessed. It has the same honesty and shows my own warts as Murder in Samarkand did. I also give some opinions based on my experience.

That may sound straightforward, but under this country’s crazy libel laws you cannot even retell things you did yourself unless you have other objective evidence that you did it. And you may not express opinions that are not mainstream, or which may upset the government or the rich and powerful.

That is not exaggerated. What follows is yesterday’s correspondence with lawyers on the text of the Catholic Orangemen. This is a lot to plough through, but to give some nuggets:
– I must refer to Sandline as a “Private Military Company” and portray their activities in Africa as supporting legitimate government against rebels
– I must portray Western action in Iraq as “peace-keeping”
– I must say Shell were involved in corruption in Nigeria “inadvertently”

When you read through the following dialogue, it is astonishing to realise that these are the lawyers of my publishers who are supposed to be on my side. Yesterday my publisher told me I should view their censorship as enabling me to get at least some of the truth published. That reminded me so strongly of Uzbekistan, where journalists would tell me they had to shove out state propaganda but could get in little anti-government nuances here and there. When it comes to publishing, we do not really have that much more freedom in the UK.

For example:

[Excerpt] 26: The defence industry is full of newly retired military personnel, and we provide military training to governments all around the world. I should confess that I didn’t yet on 6 January 1998 mentally attach the word ‘mercenary’ to Sandline, and I did not connect Sandline with Executive Outcomes during that initial telephone conversation with Spicer.
[Lawyer 1] Spicer is objecting to the description of himself as a mercenary – but surely this is a matter of fact, so nothing to worry about here?
[lawyer 2] Agree, there has always been talk about Sandline being a company employing mercenaries, although they objected to the term as you suggest which they view as pejorative. Certainly should not use it in its adjective form but here bearing in mind the context is OK. Just also spell out private military company also to appease (see above and later edits).
[Craig Murray] I reject the euphemism Private Military Company, for reasons explained in the book. Again it is not my purpose to project Sandline’s image of itself. Spicer did that in his book – which Mainstream published with apparently none of these concerns about where he was libeling others (including me).

More

Lembit on CIF

September 10th, 2008 § 0 comments § permalink

Lembit Opik:

The Segway PT (personal transporter) has the potential to do for personal transport what the mobile phone did for personal communication.

Segways are clean, quick, safe and simple. If we’re serous about our environment, we’ve got to get serious about the Segway.

CheekyEx:

Isn’t this a bit rich coming from you? You looked very chuffed on the TV recently flying your cheeky ex girlfriend to Paris for the weekend on a private flight (which you piloted.) Get off the eco soapbox before someone kicks you off it.

Double standards & the gender card

September 8th, 2008 § 0 comments § permalink

my first post about the US elections, hopefully the first of few.