June 22nd, 2011 § § permalink
I was just browsing the Express (yeah, yeah, I know, but sometimes I like to smear myself in shit) and read this story about new law and order stuff from the Conservatives (istyosty.com link)…
NOW YOU CAN BASH A BURGLAR
DAVID Cameron last night hit back at allegations that his Government is soft on crime by vowing to back home owners who fight off burglars.
Announcing a major legal shake-up, the Prime Minister pledged that property holders who use “reasonable force” against intruders would not be prosecuted.
How is that new?
David Cameron said: “My mission is to make sure that families can feel safe in their homes, and they can walk the streets freely, without fear. The system today is failing and badly needs reform.”
It needs reform so badly, it’s going to stay the same.
…the most eye-catching announcement was legal protection for people who defend their families and properties during break-ins. It would allow home owners to hit burglars or even shoot them as long as the force used can be shown in court to have been reasonable.
At risk of repeating myself, how is that new?
“So we will put beyond doubt that home owners and small shopkeepers who use reasonable force to defend themselves or their properties will not be prosecuted.”
How is, oh you get the idea.
The PM’s measures include increasing the number of life sentences handed out by the courts and ensuring that serious sexual and violent offenders spend at least half of their jail terms in custody.
Under current rules, many can walk free halfway through their sentences.
All together now… How is that new?
A new criminal offence of squatting will also be introduced to protect home owners, and squatters will be stripped of the right to claim legal aid to fight their cases.
This it is a little worrying. I don’t know any figures about squatting or what squatters give for being squatters, whether it’s to use unused property or poverty or being outside the benefits system, but I doubt the majority actually want to be squatters any more than a property owner wants to host them. So it would be nice if alongside this proposal to rid the land of squatters and prevent them from claiming someone elses property, the government put in place some other way of getting these people back into accommodation.
I love this little quote from Ken Clarke…
I’ve made a number of U-turns in my time. They should be done with purpose and panache when you do them.
If you’re gonna do a u-turn, make it a stylish one. Preferably wearing a hat at a jaunty angle.
March 16th, 2011 § § permalink
Peter Bone, the Conservative MP for Wellingborough, is exagerating a little I think…
Mr Speaker, 373,000 Daily Express readers want it, 80% of Conservative Members support it, the Deputy Prime Minister would love it, and my wife demands it. The British people, Conservative supporters, the leader of the Liberal party and especially Mrs Bone cannot all be wrong. Prime Minister: may we have a referendum on whether the United Kingdom should remain in the European Union?
60% of Daily Express readers is the British people is it? Hardly? Sales of the Express is about 7% of all national daily newspaper sales.
(My maths is shit so the percentages may be a little out, but you get the idea)
h/t Devils Kitchen
January 20th, 2011 § § permalink
You know when you want to post but nothing comes to mind? Well. This is one of those posts. I seem to be in a bit of a rut. Apathy, is a close friend at the moment. That and lack of time.
Nothing seems to get my goat, except for other drivers, who by their very nature are only allowed on the road to piss me off, and a very good job of it they’re doing too.
So, anyway. How have you been? Have you seen Anton’s being made redundant. Shitty business that is, usually. Full of fear and self-questioning. Not everyone can see being pushed out of a job as an opportunity. It can hurt. It’s different if you’ve made the decision yourself to move on. You’ve prepared yourself. You might still be going into the unknown, but it’s been your decision not somebody else making that decision for you. From his post, Anton seems to have taken it well. Which is good. As one of his commenter said…
If this blog is any guide, you’re a good bloke with a good brain and you’ll find your way.
Matt Frei has been presenting Newsnight this week, hasn’t he. It doesn’t suit him. He’s ok as a correspondent, but not as the anchor. Something about his delivery when talking to the camera, I think.
Here’s a weird ‘un for you. The Express has an article up about how white pupils are dumbers compared to kids from other ethnic groups. What’s weird about it is that it’s fairly balanced. The first part just lists the percentage of kids from different ethnic groups in that get five or more good GCSEs by town and city. No snarking or insinuations, just the figures. The second part refers to ‘experts’ and names one of them who actually, according to my lazy Googling, seems to actually be an expert. I’m fucked if I know why the Express has taken a quote from this chap, he’s only blaming poverty and not race or multiculturalism or political correctness. The prof says it’s to do with lack of aspiration, un-educated parents and unemployment. He has offered this opinion with out an anonymous counter arguement appearing in the article either. Yeah. Weird, huh?
I went for a bike ride on Saturday morning. Me and a couple of friends did an organised mountain bike event. It was bloody hard. We did the medium route, 26 miles, in just under 4 hours. I’m bloody pleased with that. It’s the first time I’ve done something like that. The hills were steep and it was really muddy, as you’d expect for January. Some of those other guys are amazing. Flying up these steep muddy hills on bikes that looked like they’d dragged out the bottom of a river. Awesome. If you’re interested here’s the results (.xls) and the medium route is in yellow (click to enlarge)
Well, I think that’s about it for this braindump.
Laters.
January 12th, 2011 § § permalink
As if you didn’t already know, but Northern and Shell, the publishers of Richard Desmonds media titles, has stopped paying its subscription to the Press Board of Finance (PressBof). As a result, they have been excluded from the self regulation system run by the PCC.
There’s enough comment about the blogosphere on it, but my post, written yesterday, is over at Expresswatch, if you’re interested.
October 2nd, 2010 § § permalink
Here’s a good site for all you Media-Watchers – istyosty.com.
Isty-who? I hear you ask.
Istyosty is a proxy service that seems to be dedicated to providing a way to read the Daily Mail, The Sun and the Express, but nothing else, without giving the papers the hits.
This is what they say, it might explain it a bit better…
WTF?
This site was set up after reading this. I thought it would be more fair to the statistics if only people who actually liked the daily mail appeared as a “hit” on the site. We are a proxy service enabling users to view that particular site without necessarily visiting it. Pages are cached here for a few days so many hits on a particular story will only count as one initial hit on that website (until the page is re-cached). Hits to the homepage however, are updated every few hours to keep it reasonably current. This system has the added advantage of providing anonymity from their invasive tracking and the advertisements from companies that should know better (we strip the ads, referer information and the javascript by default).
… and they say it’s legal.
So, if you’re linking to one of these three rags and and don’t want to increase their hits, because as far as they and their advertisers are concerned every hit is an approving hit, use an Istyosty link.
(They’re also on Twitter – twitter.com/itsyotsy)
September 24th, 2010 § § permalink
I’ve just done my first post for the new media watch site Express Watch UK.
It’s about some immigrants and home owners getting scammed by dodgy estate agent. The Express blames the immigrants, naturally.
September 18th, 2010 § § permalink
BBC…
Police sources say officers think there was “no credible threat” to the Pope after six arrested men were questioned.
Searches have finished without the discovery of anything significant.
So not only weren’t the men plotting the untimely demise of the Pope, they’re not member of Al Qaeda (however it’s fucking spelt) or Islamist extremists either.
And the Express seemed so sure, as well.
At least there’s still immigration to fall back on to get rid of the forriners.
September 18th, 2010 § § permalink
An interesting use of words from the Express…
ISLAMIC terrorists disguised as street cleaners allegedly hatched an audacious plot to blow up the Pope.
(screenshot)
Six men have been arrested in relation to a plot to assassinate the Pope. Allegedly. The Express from the first line of the above article acknowledges that they might not have been planning to help the pope meet his boss, but in the wording used the Express is saying for definate that these guys are Islamist terrorists.
The Express is saying these six guys *are* terrorists but may *not* have been plotting to kill the pope.
That’s quite an interesting assertion when the information that prompted the arrests was…
…not the result of intercepts or undercover work, but was, sources said, more akin to an overheard conversation that could be interpreted as posing a threat.
So the source of the intelligence that got the ball rolling was unlikely, in my opinion, to have heard what organisation, if any, these six suspects belong to. Details of a plan maybe, but not the parent organisation.
Anyway, if these guys, from North Africa, are not terrorists, then Immigration are bound to get them…
An investigation is also under way to determine if the foreign nationals had entered Britain legally and were entitled to work here.
Curiously enough, that line only appears in the Express as well.
18/12/2010 22:20 Update.
March 16th, 2009 § § permalink